CO129-218 - Administrator Marsh Governor Sir Bowen & Others - 1884 [11-12] — Page 388

...

385

OL

therurse).

111

my judgment it would hold

good. At the same time I think that the

validity of such

an

appropriation should be

question

placed beyond the reach of doubt or

und that power for the purpose ought to be expressly conferred by ordinance of the Colony I cannot see that there would be

impropriety in con

in conferring such a

any

power.

(00) James Stirling.

Royal Courts of Justice

8 Nov: 1884.

Further Opinion

C. O.

20962

REG.

ASEGP 9 DEC RA

I have reconsidered this case with reference

to the ordinance N°21 of 1882 and the facts stated in the memorandum of the 15th of November 1884. I adhere to the paragraphs of my former opinion markhed 183 I also adhere to the parce marked 3; but it will be observed that The provisions substituted by the ordinance of 1882 for 8 12 of the ordinance of 1866 closely resumble those contained in 0.6 of 4r +43

"Viel c. 76 and in my opinion there is substantial difference between them

4 it

As to the point discussed in the para marked

appears to me that the effect of the ordinance.

of 1882 is to deprive the Bank of all power

វ៉

to issue notes for

sums under $5, except

in